Probability theory is full of surprises. Possibly the best-known paradoxical results are the Monty Hall Problem and the two-envelope problem, but there are many others. Here we consider a simple problem using playing cards, first analysed by Pierre Raymond de Montmort (1678–1719).

## Archive for March, 2017

### Treize: A Card-Matching Puzzle

Published March 30, 2017 Occasional Leave a CommentTags: Probability

### Numerical Coincidences

Published March 23, 2017 Occasional Leave a CommentTags: Number Theory, Recreational Maths

A numerical coincidence is an equality or near-equality between different mathematical quantities which has no known theoretical explanation. Sometimes such equalities remain mysterious and intriguing, and sometimes theory advances to the point where they can be explained and are no longer regarded as surprising.

Modern science is big: the gravitational wave detector (LIGO) cost over a billion dollars, and the large hadron collider (LHC) in Geneva took decades to build and cost almost five billion euros. It may seem that scientific advances require enormous financial investment. So, it is refreshing to read in *Nature Biomedical Engineering *(Vol 1, Article 9) about the development of an ultra-cheap centrifuge that costs only a few cents to manufacture [TM111 or search for “thatsmaths” at irishtimes.com].

### Brun’s Constant and the Pentium Bug

Published March 9, 2017 Occasional 1 CommentTags: Arithmetic, Euler, Number Theory

Euclid showed by a deliciously simple argument that the number of primes is infinite. In a completely different manner, Euler confirmed the same result. Euler’s conclusion followed from his demonstration that the sum of the reciprocals of the primes diverges:

Obviously, this could not happen if there were only finitely many primes.

### Enigmas of Infinity

Published March 2, 2017 Irish Times Leave a CommentTags: Analysis, History, Logic

Children sometimes amuse themselves searching for the biggest number. After trying millions, billions and trillions, they realize that there is no end to the game: however big a number may be, we can always add 1 to produce a bigger number: the set of counting numbers is infinite. The concept of infinity has intrigued philosophers since antiquity, and it leads to many surprises and paradoxical results [TM110 or search for “thatsmaths” at irishtimes.com].

You must be logged in to post a comment.